By: Carmen Willings teachingvisuallyimpaired.com Updated June 14, 2025
Documenting print reading rates is an essential component of evaluating a student’s reading efficiency and determining whether print is an appropriate primary literacy medium. The Teacher of Students with Visual Impairments (TVI) should assess whether the student:
Completes academic tasks efficiently using print,
Makes expected academic progress over time, and
Performs comparably to sighted peers using preferred reading media and low vision devices.
Beyond Short Passages: Considering Visual Fatigue
While short passage assessments are helpful for monitoring progress, they do not reflect whether visual fatigue is impacting reading over time. To get a complete picture, TVIs should:
Assess reading performance during longer reading tasks
Collaborate with classroom teachers to evaluate reading during class assessments
Compare reading performance in the morning vs. end of day, especially if fatigue is suspected
Factors to Consider in Media Decision-Making
When determining the continued appropriateness of print, the IEP team should consider:
Academic achievement trends
Performance on standardized and state competency tests
The magnitude of discrepancy between the student and their sighted peers
The presence of reading fatigue or slowed progress
Suggested Solutions As outlined on page 262 of Foundations of Low Vision: Clinical and Functional Perspectives (Corn & Koenig, AFB), possible recommendations include:
Continue to use print as the primary literacy medium, supplemented by additional tools (e.g., audiobooks, reader services).
Continuing with print, but providing targeted, intensive instruction to increase reading efficiency and academic achievement.
Introduce braille reading and writing while continuing to use print and other tools. This allows the student to continue progressing academically while building braille proficiency. Braille may eventually become the primary or secondary medium.
Grade-Level Reading Rate Benchmarks
Reading rates are typically measured in Words Per Minute (WPM) and can vary based on the tool and whether the student is reading orally or silently. Fountas & Pinnell Benchmarks (Oral Reading – Sighted Students):
End of 1st Grade (J–K): 75–100 WPM
End of 2nd–3rd Grade (L–M–N): 90–120 WPM
End of 3rd Grade (N–O–P): 100–140 WPM
End of 4th Grade (Q–R–S): 120–160 WPM
End of 5th Grade (T–U–V): 140–180 WPM
End of 6th Grade (W–X–Y): 160–200 WPM
End of 7th–8th Grade (Y–Z): 180–220 WPM
Note: These benchmarks reflect reading rates for students with unimpaired vision and may be higher than other tools.
Corn & Koenig Benchmarks
The following describes the typical oral and silent reading rates for students without visual impairments from Foundations of Low Vision: Clinical and Functional Perspectives
1st grade – 60WPM oral reading, less than 81 WPM silent reading
Use the following formula to determine reading rate:
Step 1: Record the number of seconds the student takes to read a passage.
Step 2: Divide the number of words in the passage by the number of seconds.
Step 3: Multiply the result by 60 to get words per minute.
Example: 120 words ÷ 90 seconds = 1.33 1.33 × 60 = 80 WPM Alternatively, divide the number of words by the number of minutes taken to read the passage.
Reading Rates in Students with Visual Impairments
It is common for students with visual impairments to have slower reading rates than sighted peers. This does not automatically mean that print is inappropriate. The IEP team should consider:
Year-to-year academic progress
Reading efficiency vs. effort
Long-term implications for academic competitiveness
The goal is to ensure the student has equal access to the curriculum using the media that supports independence, speed, comprehension, and endurance.
Additional Resources...
Basic Reading Inventory (Jerry Johns) An informal reading inventory available in Large Print and Braille from APH. Assesses instructional, independent, and frustration reading levels and helps determine optimal literacy media.
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired (TSBVI) Learning Media Assessment Comprehensive tools and guidance for conducting LMAs.
Functional Vision and Learning Media Assessment (FVLMA) – APH A digital tool to store, track, and analyze visual functioning and media use to support media decisions. aph.org/product/fvlma-kit/
Subscribe today!
Subscribe today to unlock premium resources & printables. Choose the subscription level that best fits your needs and get immediate access to additional printable resources, ECC tools, and more. Subscription plans are individual and non-transferable. Your membership helps sustain and grow this resource for the vision community. Thank you for your support!